HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WP .NO: 19870 of 2007 Between:
1 Lalam Venkata Vara Prasad, S/o Sanyasi Rao,
2 Lalam Ramunaidu, S/o Ramulu,
3 Kesireddy Satyanarayana, S/o Mallaiah, All are R/o Gurajapalem Gram Panchayat, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4 Eka Chinnodu, S/o Veeranna, R/o Dorayyapalem, H/o Gurujapalem Gram Panchayat, Rambilli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
. Petitioners AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, represented by its Commissioner.
2 The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited represented by its Managing Director, Uppal, Hyderabad.
3 The Special Deputy Collector (LA) and Special Officer, R&R Visakhapatnam, c/o Office of the District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
4 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
5 The Special Deputy Collector (LP), Visakhapatnam and Special Officer for Rehabilitation, NAOP and SEZ O/o District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
6 The Tahsildar, Rambilli Mandal, Rambilli, Visakhapatnam District.
. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not providing proper and adequate Resettlement and Rehabilitation procedure as prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.68 Irrigation and Ayacut Development (Project Wing A-II R & R) Department dated 8-4-2005 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to provide Rehabilitation Colony at Edurawada Revenue S.No.1 instead of Dibbapalem Village to the petitioners herein under resettlement and rehabilitation policy under G.O.Ms.No.68 dated 8-4-2005.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners, G.P. for Revenue for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6 and Sri P. Roy Reddy, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, the Court made the following ORDER:
Learned standing counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to the latest material received by him on the subject matter of the writ petition. The standing counsel is directed to place the material he intends to rely upon by way of additional affidavit by the next date of hearing.
Post on 19.06.2014 along with WP.No.20159 of 2007.
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 One CC to Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, Advocate (OPUC)
2 One CC to Sri P. Roy Reddy, Standing Counsel (By Spl. Messenger)
3 Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court, Hyderabad. (OUT)
4 One spare copy. nnr HIGH COURT SVB,J DATED: 13-6-2014 NOTE: Post on 19-6-2014 along with WP No.20159 of 2007 ORDER W.P.NO. 19870 OF 2007 DIRECTION HIGH COURT Nnr Date of Drafting : 16-6-2014 SVB,J DATED: 13-6-2014 NOTE: Post on 19-6-2014 along with WP No.20159 of 2007 ORDER W.P.NO. 19870 OF 2007 DIRECTION