Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Lakshminarasamma @ Amyamma W/O vs M N Narasimha Murthy And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|12 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.44412/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA @ AMYAMMA W/O NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT M.N.KOTE, GUBBI TALUK-572216 TUMAKUR DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI NAIK RAMACHANDRA RAMA, ADV.) AND:
1. M N NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.109 3RD CROSS, MALLSANDRA BANGALORE-560057.
2. SRI. NARSANNA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. SRI. RAJANNA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESPONDENT No.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT PIPE LINE B.H.E.L. COLONY 6TH CROSS, MALLSANDRA BANGALORE-560057.
4. SRI. KRISHANAPPA S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.2, 1ST MAIN ROAD MALLSANDRA BANGALORE-560057.
5. SRI. B. NARASIMIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS HESSARGHATTA MAIN ROAD OPP. GAMINI GARMENTS BHUVANESHAWARINAGAR BANGALORE-560057.
6. SRI. S. MUNIRAJU S/O SONAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT LAGGERE DOLLARS COLONY SETTYHALLI BANGALORE-560015. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D N RAMACHANDRAPPA, ADV.FOR R1 SRI S NAGARAJ, ADV. FOR R5 SRI K SUMAN, ADV. FOR R6 R2 TO R4 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.06.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE IN I.A.42 IN O.S.1743/2005 VIDE ANNEX-E AND ALLOW THE I.A.42 AND PERMITTED THE DEFENDANT NO.6 / PETITIONER TO PERMIT TO AMEND THE WRITTEN STATEMENT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 30.06.2016 on I.A.No.42 in O.S.No.1743/2005 on the file of the XXV Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge at Bengaluru [CCH No.23] ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.1743/2005 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Lakshminarasamma @ Amyamma W/O vs M N Narasimha Murthy And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
12 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha