IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.31961-31962/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT LAKSHMIDEVI W/O DARSHAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT SRI VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA, GIRINAGARA,1ST MAIN ROAD KYTHASANDRA, TUMKUR-572104 2. KUMARI SUPRIYA D/O DARSHAN AGED ABOUT 4 1/2 YEARS R/AT SRI VEERABHADRESAWARA NILAYA, GIRINAGAR 1ST MAIN ROAD, KYTHASANDRA TUMKUR-572104 SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI (MOTHER) (BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU, ADV.) AND SRI DARSHAN S/O B D KANTHARAJU ... PETITIONERS AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT BALEKOPPULU KARJUHALLI POST, ALUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573213 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADV.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT TUMKUR IN CRL. MISC. NO.14/2014 DT.7.2.2014 ON I.A.NO.2 AS PER ANNX-A TO THE W.P. AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY A MAINTENANCE OF RS.20,000/- EVERY MONTH TO THE PETITIONER TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE WRIT PETITION BY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONRS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT IN CRL. MISC.NO.14/2014.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that since these petitions have become infructuous, he may be permitted to withdraw the petitions.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE DM