Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Lakshmi Ajoy Kumar vs Government Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|24 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Mr.M.K.Subramanian, learned Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent. Mr.R.Arunmozhi, learned counsel takes notice for respondents 2 and 3.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing forbearing the second respondent and third respondents or anybody on their behalf from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing and demolition with regard to the main building (front side) existing at ground floor of Block No.81-A, Door No.AE-135, 4th Avenue (Shanthi Colony), Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040 pending determination of the Revision / Review petition submitted by the petitioner under section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu town and Country Planning Act dated 16.03.2017 with the first respondent.
4. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the property in question. It appears that alleging unauthorized/deviated construction, de-occupation notice was issued to the petitioner on 27.2.2017. Against the same, the petitioner has preferred a special revision before the first respondent under Section 80-A of the Act along with a petition for stay. However, it is alleged that no orders have been passed even in the stay petition till date. The petitioner is apprehending that the respondent-authorities would take coercive steps to demolish the building. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct the first respondent to consider the special revision petition and the stay petition filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the disposal of the special revision petition, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent authorities.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lakshmi Ajoy Kumar vs Government Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 March, 2017