IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.58744/2017(KLR-RES) BETWEEN 1. SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE GAVIRANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT #10, OLD MYSORE ROAD K R PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 2. SRI NANJAPPA S/O NILLAIAH R/A #1234, KR PETE KR PETE, KASABA & TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 3. SINGRAIAH S/O SHILAIAH AGED MAJOR R/A #1234, KR PETE KR PETE KASABA & TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 4. K K CHALUVAIAH S/O K KALAIAH AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 5. K RAVI S/O K KALAIAH AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 6. SMT PADMA D/O K KALAIAH AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 7. SRI K MANJUNATH SON OF AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571 426 8. SMT LAKSHMAMMA D/O SINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 9. SRI KALAIAH S/O CHALUVAIAH R/A AGRAHARA, KR PETE MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 10. SRI RAJU S/O THIMMAIAH AND RESIDING AT AGRAHARA, KR PETE, MANDYA DISTRICT KARNATAKA-571426 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI N S SANJAY GOWDA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDINGS BENGALURU-560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571401 3. THE THASILDAR K R PET TALUK, K R PET MANDYA DISTRICT-571426 4. KR PETE TOWN MUNCIPAL COUNCIL K R PET TALUK KR PET MANDYA DISTRICT-571426 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 19.09.2016 PASSED IN APPEAL NO.1234, 1235, 1236 OF 2013, APPEAL NO.1931 OF 2003 AND APPEAL NO.50 TO 53 OF 2004 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VIDE ANNEXURE-F TO THE EXTENT WHERE THE MATTER IS REMANDED BACK TO THASILDAR (3RD RESPONDENT).
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In this proceedings, inspite of granting sufficient time for removal of office objections, they are not removed.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-