Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Lakshmamma And Others vs Smt Dasamma And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NOS.34192-193 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, @ MUNILAKSHMAMMA, D/O PAPAMMA AND KENCHAPPA, W/O MUDDAPPA @ MUNAIAH, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT JYOTHINAGAR, (HORAMAVU) AGARA, BANGALORE-560043.
2. SMT MEENAMMA, D/O LATE RAMALINGA, AND MUNIYAMMA, W/O NARASIMHAPPA, AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT AVATHI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562 110. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI PARAMESWARAPPA C, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. DASAMMA, D/O LATE POOJAPPA, AGE 68 YEARS, R/A HOSAHALI VILLAGE, BOODIGERE POST, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, PIN-562129.
2. SMT MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE ANGADI CHIKKANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
3. SRI SHIVANNA, S/O LATE ANGADI CHIKKANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
4. SRI SHIVAPRAKASH, S/O LATE ANGADI CHIKKANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
5. SRI SRINIVAS, S/O LATE ANGADI CHIKKANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 ARE R/A BAGALUR VILLAGE AND POST, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560063.
6. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. …RESPONDENTS ***** THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18.07.2018 IN O.S.NO.388/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI AT ANNEXURE-A ON APPLICATION DATED 17.07.2018 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AS WELL AS THIS WRIT PETITION.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo submitting that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
3. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioners, memo is accepted.
4. The writ petitions are disposed off as having not been pressed, in terms of memo.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Lakshmamma And Others vs Smt Dasamma And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 October, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit