IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1549 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN:
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA DAUGHTER OF GANGANNA (SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LRS) 1(a) SRI. LAKSHMINARAYANA HUSBAND OF LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 1(b) SRI. RAVIKUMAR SON OF LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
1(c) SMT. MANJAMMA DAUGHTER OF LAKSHAMMA AGED 25 YEARS.
1(d) SRI. LAKSHMINARAYANA SON OF LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT TUBUGUNTE VILLAGE KOLIGERE POST DODDABALLAPUR TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.B.THYAGARAJA., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SRI. LAKSHMAIAH SON OF GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBUGUNTE KOLIGEREPOST DODDABALLAPUR TALUK.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN REGUAL APPEAL NO. 74/2007 DATED 12.06.2017 PASSED BY THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DODDABALLAPUR MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY CIVIL JUDGE AT DODDABALLAPUR IN O.S. NO. 113/2005 DATED 12.10.2007.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment On 08.08.2019, three weeks’ time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellants to comply with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal shall be listed for dismissal if the office objections are not complied with. Despite this order, the office objections have not been attended to. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. As such, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr