IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.54264/2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN SMT. LAKKAMMA DEAD BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. S.MARUTHI, S/O LATE LAKKAMMA, AGED 51 YEARS, 2. S.KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE LAKKAMMA, AGED 41 YEARS, 3. S.MANJUNATH S/O LATE LAKKAMMA, AGED 37 YEARS, 4. S.KANTHA RAJ S/O LATE LAKKAMMA, AGED 34 YEARS, NOW ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.102, VINAYA APARTMENT, GNANABHARATHI MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI BAYYA REDDY N, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SMT. N.V. RAMANI W/O D.NATARAJAN, D/O LATE NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.37/4, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE.
2. RUDRAMUNISWAMY, SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 2(a) SMT.NARASAMMA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS W/O LATE RUDRAMUNISWAMY, 2(b) SMT.ANNAPOORNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, D/O LATE RUDRAMUNISWAMY BOTH ARE RESIDING AT THUBUGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT – 561 204. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI C SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE V ADDL. CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, CCCH-13, BANGALORE IN O.S.9467/2004 ON I.A.11 UNDER ORDER 6 RULE 17 OF THE CPC DATED 18.11.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATION I.A.NO.11.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Legal representatives of second defendant in O.S.No.9467/2004 on the file of V Additional City Civil Judge (CCH-13), Bengaluru, have come up in this writ petition impugning the order dated 18.11.2015 passed on IA.No.11.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration this day, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that main proceedings in trial court namely, O.S.No.9467/2004 itself is disposed of on 22.09.2018. The same is confirmed by the e-courts website of Bengaluru District. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition as the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the memo is taken on record and this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-