Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.V.George vs 2 Division Railway Manager ...

Madras High Court|11 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is seen from the adjudication before the learned Additional Master-II, is that the plaintiffs are absent for three continuous hearings, which shows that the plaintiffs are not interested in proceeding with the suit. Hence the matter is referred to this Court.
2. Today, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs submitted that due to personal inconvenience, the plaintiffs are not able to appear before the learned Additional Master-II for recording of evidence.
2. However, already sufficient opportunities have been given to the plaintiffs, they have not filed any proof affidavit and documents.
3. Therefore, the Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
11.01.2017 jv Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No P.VELMURUGAN,J.
jv C.S.No.93 of 2004 11.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.V.George vs 2 Division Railway Manager ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
11 January, 2017