Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kusum vs State Of Up

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33962 of 2019 Applicant :- Kusum Opposite Party :- State Of Up Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajesh Mishra, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that the applicant is a woman with no previous criminal history; that there is no recovery from the part of the applicant; that the bail application of the applicant has been wrongly rejected by the trial court vide order dated 09.07.2019. The applicant has no criminal antecedent to his credit. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the reasons as stated above, the facts and circumstances of the case as have been discussed at the Bar of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that he has no criminal antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicant, Kusum, involved in Case Crime No.10 of 2019, under Sections 60, 63 of Excise Act, Police Station Sector 49 Noida, District Gautambudh Nagar, she shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
The applicant is directed to produce a certified copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
In view of aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 VKG
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kusum vs State Of Up

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Dubey