Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Kuruba Hanumakka vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh

High Court Of Telangana|24 September, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.28817 of 2014 Dated :24.09.2014 Between:
Kuruba Hanumakka, W/o.Chinna Anjinappa, Aged about 65 years, R/o.Edula Balapuram, Somandipalli Mandal, Anantapur District and two others .. Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Registrations, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others .. Respondents This Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.28817 of 2014 ORDER :
In this writ petition, the only grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the documents presented by them for registration in connection with immovable properties.
2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue submit that the subject matter to the extent of No Objection Certificate is squarely covered by the decision of Division Bench in W.A.No.1653 of 2013. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for petitioners also submits that the land in issue is not assigned.
3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Penukonda, Anantapur District (3rd respondent) to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioners without insisting upon such NOC and in the event the documents presented fulfils the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, he shall register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. However, if the 3rd respondent is of the opinion that the documents presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO,J 24th September, 2014 Rns
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kuruba Hanumakka vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
24 September, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao