Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Kuppammal vs Balarama Naicker And Others

Madras High Court|02 August, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondents report before this Court that there is no instruction from their respective clients. Further more, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo with returned postal cover addressed to the appellant and submits that the postal cover was returned as “insufficient address”.
2. Recording the above said submission, this Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
26.07.2017 ari Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To
1. The Principal District Court, Chingleput.
2. The District Munsif Court, Chingleput.
S.A.No.126 of 2001
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kuppammal vs Balarama Naicker And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 August, 2017
Judges
  • G Jayachandran Second