IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.51347/2016(BDA) BETWEEN:
KUNDAPUR UMESH SHET, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE SADASHIVA RAO SHET, VAISHAK APARTMENT, NO.37-7, 2-4, 4TH MAIN, OBALAPPA GARDEN, TATA SILK FARM, BANGALORE-560 070.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI ANANTHA NARAYANA B. N., ADVOCATE) AND:
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
... RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE) …… THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO EXECUTE REGISTERED SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER PURSUANT TO THE ALLOTMENT LETTER AS PER ANNEXURE-A DATED 16.6.2016.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo dated 11.12.2017 seeking to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, in the event the respondent/Bangalore Development Authority fails to allot an alternative and suitable site, as promised.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE kcm