IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.25 OF 2017 Between:
SMT. KUMUDA W/O.L.SHYAM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT ‘A’ BLOCK 8TH CROSS DEVARAJ URS EXTENSION DAVANAGERE – 577 002. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
SMT. H.VIJAYA D/O. LATE B. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O. SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA VENKAPURA BHOVI COLONY SHIVAMOGGA – 577 202. ...RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.09.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.62/13 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.601/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 30.08.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge GH