IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No. 21219 of 2014 BETWEEN Kum.Nimmala Shirisha and others AND ... PETITIONERS The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Department of Revenue), A.P. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others.
...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Heard.
2. Petitioner complains of inaction on the part of respondent Nos.3 and 4 against the alleged attempts of respondent No.2 against the land claimed by the petitioner admeasuring Ac.1-21 cents in Survey No.167/3 and 187/1 at Duggirala Village, Eluru, West Godavari District.
3. The averments in the affidavit show that petitioner had already obtained a decree, which was confirmed in A.S.No.164 of 2000 on the file of I Additional District Judge, West Godavari District, on 20.09.2005 and in execution of the said decree, petitioner claims to be in possession of the property. Alleging interference by respondent No.2 accompanied by two persons, the petitioner claims to have approached respondent Nos.3 and 4 for protection.
3. Learned government pleader has taken instructions from the Inspector of Police, III Town L&O Police Station, Eluru, wherein it is specifically stated that no complaint whatsoever is received from the petitioner and hence, no action could be taken against respondent No.2. It is also further stated that the dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2 appears to be purely of civil nature. However, if petitioner approaches the respondents to lodge any cognizable complaint, appropriate action would be taken.
4. In view of the fact that no complaint is lodged by the petitioner, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. However, petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned police station, if there any future cause of action.
Writ petition is, accordingly, closed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 5, 2014 LMV