IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT W.P.No.4533 OF 2019 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN KUM. MANOJNA S. MALIYE, D/O DR.M. SHARATH CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.11-A, AYURVEDA PRATISHTHANA HOSPITAL QUARTERS, 32ND CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 070. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.N.G. PHADKE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 041.
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION), RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 041.
3. M/S SHREE PARIPOORNA SANATHANA AYUUVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & RESEARCH CENTRE, NO.91, ARJUNABETTAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, RAILWAY GOLLAHALLI POST, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 023.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. KASHYAP.N.I, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS AND ISSUE DIRECTION DIRECTING THE R-2 TO CONDUCT PHYSICAL REVALUATION OF THE SAMSKRUTHA ANSWER SCRIPT AT ANNEXURE-J OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Petitioner, a student of 2nd year Ayurvedic Medicine in the 3rd respondent-institution having been failed in her Sanskrutha language paper of the 1st year examination of September 2018, has knocked at the doors of Writ Court complaining about apparently an erratic evaluation of answers at the hands of some irresponsible examiners.
2. After service of notice the learned Sr. Panel Counsel Shri N.K.Ramesh appearing for the 1st respondent-University and the 2nd respondent-Registrar (Evaluation), in all fairness caused a fresh valuation of the Answer Papers at the hands of examiners other than the ones who did it earlier, and has on request of the Court placed a fresh Statement of Marks in a sealed cover, which later is returned for announcement of results accordingly within one week.
3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed off.
The fair approach of the learned Sr. Panel Counsel for the University to the grievance of the petitioner-student commends appreciation.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE cbc