Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4471 of 2018 Revisionist :- Kuldeep Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and the learned A.G.A.
This revision is filed by the revisionist for setting aside the order dated 27.11.2018 of Addl. Sess. Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act, Auraiya in Special Trial No.25P of 2018 State Vs. Rinku and others in Case Crime No.734 of 2017 under Section 376/511, 341, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, PS Dibiyapur, distt. Auraiya whereby learned Special Judge allowed the application No.21Kh under Section 319 CrPC and summoned the revisionist under Section 376/511, 341, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for revisionist submits that grievance of revisionist would be sufficiently met in case bail application of revisionist is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the revisionist surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the revisionist.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.12.2018 RajneeshDR) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)