Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kshitij Shinghal And Others vs State Of Up And Other

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7421 of 2021 Petitioner :- Kshitij Shinghal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Other Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Murari Lal Jain
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 05.08.2021 registered as Case Crime No. 659 of 2021, U/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Police Station-Civil Lines, District-Moradabad.
b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of first infomration report 05.08.2021 registered as Case Crime No. 659 of 2021, U/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Police Station-Civil Lines, District-Moradabad."
Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioners to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/ bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioner along with a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Deepak/ Digitally signed by JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI Date: 2021.09.22 11:28:06 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM Date: 2021.09.22 11:29:19 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kshitij Shinghal And Others vs State Of Up And Other

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2021
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Sanjay Kumar Pandey