Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.S.Anandan vs 3 The Thasildar

Madras High Court|12 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.
2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to issue suitable direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to issue patta to him in respect of Survey No.130/7 measuring an extent of 1.50 acres situated at 59, Periyakavanam Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District, by considering the representation dated 03.06.2017.
4. Mr.T.Sellapandian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a representation to the 1st respondent for issuance of patta on 03.06.2017, however, the 1st respondent has not considered the same yet. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the respondents are trying to take possession of the agricultural land wherein the paddy crops are raised by the petitioner. The petitioner has also produced the photographs showing that the paddy crops are standing in the agricultural land of the petitioner.
5. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 3rd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for issuance of patta in accordance with law, within a time frame.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the the petitioner in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2017 for the issuance of patta and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to all the interested parties. Till such time, the respondents shall not cause any hindrance to the paddy crops raised by the petitioner.
With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.S.Anandan vs 3 The Thasildar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
12 June, 2017