Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Krishna Murari vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18196 of 2021 Applicant :- Krishna Murari Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shailendra Singh Rathore
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 51 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 336, 307, 302 IPC, Police Station Bewar, District Mainpuri with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The report of this incident was lodged under the above mentioned Sections of the IPC by the complainant against as many as five named accused including the present applicant Krishna Murari. It was alleged in the report that the named accused have committed mar-pit with complainant side and the father the complainant succumbed to the injuries caused by the accused persons.
The contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant-accused is quite innocent and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the present accused applicant deserves bail as Arvind, Sadanand, Sunil Kumar and Divyanshu @ Bhole, who have already been granted bail by another Benches of this Court and the case of the present accused is similar, the copies of their bail orders submitted by the learned counsel for applicant during the hearing are taken on record. It is also submitted that the the role assigned to the present applicant was similar to the role assigned to above named co- accused who have been admitted to bail. Lastly, it is argued that the applicant is in jail since 2.2.2021 and that in case applicant is enlarged on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. But he accepts the bail parity of the present applicant with co-accused detailed above.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
The prayer for bail is granted. The application is allowed.
Let applicant Krishna Murari involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(1). The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(2). The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(3). In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court may initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(4). The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the learned counsel for the applicant alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 LBY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Krishna Murari vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Sushil Dubey