Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Krishna Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 21
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1543 of 2021 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4 and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.5-Gaon Sabha and perused the record.
Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in the nature of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for removal of illegal encroachment made by private respondent nos.6 to 8 over Gata No.581, area 0.0910 hectares, situated in Village-Babupur Belo, Pargana-Mah and Tehsil Handia, District Prayagraj.
It is submitted that public utility land i.e. Gata No.581, area 0.0910 hectares, situated in Village-Babupur Belo, Pargana- Mah and Tehsil Handia, District Prayagraj is recorded as Navin Parti in the revenue record. Respondent nos.6 to 8 have illegally encroached upon the land in question, without any legal right and title, otherwise than in accordance with the law, which is causing inconvenience to the public at large. In support of his case, petitioner has filed extract of Khatauni 1425 Fasli to 1430 Fasli (Annexure no.1). It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed representation dated 25.08.2021, which has been filed as Annexure-4, before the authorities concerned to ventilate his grievances qua illegal encroachment made by respondent nos. 6 to 8 over the plots in question as mentioned above.
Grievance of the petitioner is that despite the representation dated 25.08.2021, having been submitted, till date no effective measures have been taken by the authorities concerned to remove the illegal encroachment made by respondent nos.6 to 10, over plots in question, by either initiating a proceeding under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or rejecting the application filed by the petitioner. It is thus urged that not taking any action against the encroachment over the public property amounts omission from legal obligation entrusted upon the officer concerned under the law.
Learned Standing Counsel, however, contended that petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy to move an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, with respect to his grievances as made in the present writ petition.
In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition filed in the nature of public interest litigation (PIL), without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction that petitioner is at liberty to move fresh representation, within period of three weeks from today, qua his grievances as mentioned in the present writ petition along with copy of this order before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Azamgarh (respondent no.3), who shall take action and initiate legal proceeding under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and conclude the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the aforesaid representation. It is ordered accordingly.
The petitioner shall file a computer generated copy of this order before the authority concerned, after downloading it from the official website of High Court, Allahabad, which shall be supported by an affidavit. The authority concerned shall verify the same from the official website of this Court.
With the aforesaid observations, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 23.9.2021 pks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Krishna Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 September, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Pathak
Advocates
  • Neeraj Singh Yadav