Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28380 of 2021 Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Dhar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent no. 4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide Suit No. T201705470108318 (Krishna Kant and another Vs. Sursati and others) under Section 134 of U.p. REvenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Maharajganj, is directed to decide Suit No. T201705470108318 (Krishna Kant and another Vs. Sursati and others) under Section 134 of U.p. REvenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 29.10.2021 Ravi/-