Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Krishan Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27714 of 2018 Petitioner :- Krishan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam,Pranjal Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
It is the case of the petitioner that he had participated for the post of Police Constable and Constable PAC (Male) Direct Recruitment-2015 as advertised by Advertisement dated 29.12.2015.
It is the case of the petitioner that by means of the Notification dated 07.09.2018, the cut-off merit of the general candidate has again reduced to 399.33. The petitioner has higher marks to the last cut-off merit in General Category. Since the petitioner has alleged secured 403.76 marks, he ought to have been treated as selected.
In view of the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation along with a certified copy of this order to the respondent no. 2 (The Chairman/Additional Secretary, U.P. Police Recruitment & Promotion Board, Tulsi Ganga Complex, U.P., Luknow), within two weeks from today who shall consider the case of the petitioner as an un-reserved candidate and pass appropriate orders looking into marks secured by him, within a period of four weeks from the date such representation is filed.
The writ petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 21.12.2018 C. MANI
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Krishan Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Bhatia
Advocates
  • Vijay Gautam Pranjal Shukla