Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kripal And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 47040 of 2018 Applicant :- Kripal And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.
This application is filed by the applicant for quashing the Non-bailable Warrant dated 13.02.2017 passed by A.C.J.M., Budaun in Criminal Case No.1024 of 2016 (State vs. Ghalendra and others) pending before A.C.J.M., Budaun arising out of Case Crime No. 294 of 2015, under Sections 308, 323, 504 IPC, P.S. Bisauli, District Badaun.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicants submits that grievance of applicants would be sufficiently met in case bail application of applicant is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the applicants surrender before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants.
With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Radhika (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kripal And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Advocates
  • Jaysingh Yadav