Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kripal @ Ram Kripal Yadav vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6474 of 2018 Applicant :- Kripal @ Ram Kripal Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Shive Datta Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2016 dated 4.7.2016 (arising out of Case Crime No. 0004 of 2016), under Sections 147, 353, 332, 336, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.
Narwal, District Kanpur Nagar as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 43684 of 2016.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Even, without reliable material charge sheet has been submitted and now the warrant has been issued. Hence, the entire proceeding is liable to be quashed. Alternative prayer is to issue direction to the court below to consider the prayer for bail of the applicant in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Amarawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004(57) ALR-390 and by the Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2009 (4) SCC 437.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the aforesaid prayer.
Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the allegation, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out. The version of the defence has to be examined at appropriate stage, on the basis of evidence adduced by the parties, in accordance with law. Hence, no interference is required u/s 482 Cr.P.C. However, the court concerned is expected to scrutinize the material very carefully so any innocent person is not harassed, prosecuted and held guilty.
However, without expressing any opinion on merit, in view of the facts, if the applicant appears before the court concerned within three weeks from today and applies for bail, it is expected that the same will be considered and disposed off, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
With aforesaid observation and direction, the present application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018/A.K.Srivastava
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kripal @ Ram Kripal Yadav vs State Of U P And Anr

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Tripathi
Advocates
  • Shive Datta Yadav