Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.Ramasubbu vs V.Sivakumar

Madras High Court|21 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This revision arises against two concurrent judgments of Courts below, convicting petitioner for offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo four months S.I. and pay fine of Rs.1,500/- i/d one month S.I.
2. Respondent/complainant moved a prosecution informing that cheque dated 30.03.20111 for Rs.1,62,800/- drawn on ICICI Coimbatore Branch, stood issued to him by petitioner towards part discharge of the total amount due under pro-note, which upon presentation, returned unpaid for the reason Account Closed on 02.04.2011. Respondent/complainant caused statutory notice and following the procedures envisaged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint had been laid.
4. Before the trial Court, the complainant examined himself as witness and marked six exhibits. Accused himself examined on behalf of the defence and did not mark any exhibit.
5. On an appreciation of materials before it, the trial Court, under judgment in S.T.C.No.260 of 2011 dated 22.05.2013, convicted the petitioner for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to undergo four months S.I. and to pay fine of Rs.1,500/- i/d one month S.I. The appeal preferred by petitioner in C.A.No.76 of 2013 on the file of learned I Additional District and Session Judge, Coimbatore, came to be dismissed under judgment dated 30.08.2013. Hence, this revision.
6. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
7. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the interim order of this Court dated 05.03.2014 requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the credit of S.T.C.No.286 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Magistrate Level-II, Coimbatore, has not been complied with. However, the learned counsel for respondent submitted that the respondent would be satisfied, if the total cheque amount of Rs.1,62,800/- is made good to him by the accused.
8. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the said sum will be paid to the credit of S.T.C.No.286 of 2012 within a period of six months.
9. Accordingly, while confirming the finding of conviction arrived at by Courts below, this Court alters the sentence to
(i) requiring the petitioner to effect payment of compensation in a sum of Rs.1,62,800/- to the credit of S.T.C.No.260 of 2011 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Magistrate Level-II, Coimbatore, within a period of six months from today. In default, petitioner will undergo 4 months S.I.
(ii) Respondent may, on due application, seek payment out of the sum to be deposited by the petitioner/accused pursuant to this order.
10. The Criminal Revision Case shall stand disposed of with the above modification.
21.09.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no kmi C.T. SELVAM, J kmi To
1.The I Additional District Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
2.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Magistrate Level-II, Coimbatore.
Crl.R.C.No.257 of 2014 21.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.Ramasubbu vs V.Sivakumar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2017