Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.Palaniselvam vs State Represented By

Madras High Court|27 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The Inspector of Police, C.S.CID, Dindigul.
2.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.Palaniselvam vs State Represented By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.