Dated: 24.10.2014 Between:
Kovvuri Narayana Reddy S/o.Seeta Reddy.
…..Petitioner And Tahasildar, Ravulapalem Mandal, East Godavari District and two others.
…..Respondents The Court made the following:
ORDER :
The writ petition is filed for Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in an extent of Ac.0-02 ½ cents in R.S.No.187/1 of Ravulpadu Village of Ravulapalem Mandal, East Godavari District, as illegal and unconstitutional.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
3. The petitioner claims possession and enjoyment through assignment dated 26.06.2002. On being apprehensive of unauthorized interference with his possession, the writ petition is filed.
4. This Court, through order, dated 24.09.2009, protected the possession of the petitioner.
5. The respondent filed a petition to vacate interim order and by way of reply, it is stated that the grievance stated by the petitioner is unfounded. The stand as taken is placed on record viz., “that this respondent never interfered with the possession of the petitioner herein at any point of time. This respondent has nothing to do with the disputes that arose between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Hence, the writ petition deserves no consideration.”
6. From the above, it is clear that the 1st respondent is not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. Therefore, by placing on record the stand of the 1st respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. Insofar as the other respondents are concerned, the cause will be purely a civil dispute between them. The parties are at liberty to work out their remedies in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
7. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
24th October 2014.
S.V. BHATT, J
mar