Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Kousalya vs The Joint Commissioner

Madras High Court|27 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 03.03.2016 and the consequential eviction notice issued by the second respondent dated 31.08.2017 by which the petitioner was directed to vacate the premises or or before 19.09.2017.
2.Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Saravanan, learned counsel takes notice for the third respondent.
3.By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
4.The case of the petitioner is that he is a tenant under the third respondent and with the permission of the third respondent, the petitioner also constructed a small tiled house for residential purpose on the property. While so, the 3rd respondent had issued a notice as if the petitioner is an encroacher and defaulted in payment of rent. Though the petitioner has been paying the rent without any default, without any notice regarding fixation of fair rent, the third respondent has passed the impugned order of eviction. When the revision filed by the petitioner against the order passed in the review petition, is pending consideration by the 1st respondent, the impugned order came to be passed. Hence, aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.
5.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner has handed over two Demand Drafts, dated 22.09.2017, drawn on Indian Bank, High Court Branch, Madurai (1) D.D.No.385103 for Rs.49,000/- and (2) D.D.No.385104 for Rs.7109.00/-, towards arrears of rent to the learned counsel for the third respondent and he has also received the same.
6. In view of the above payment, the petitioner is directed to pay the fair rent as fixed by the third respondent without any default and honour the commitment in future. Agreeing to pay the rent to be fixed by the third respondent, the respondents, especially respondent No.2 is directed to drop all other proceedings pending against the petitioner. However, it is made clear that in the event of the petitioner committing any default in compliance of remittance of monthly rent, the respondents are at liberty to evict the petitioner forthwith.
7.With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Madurai-1.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Madurai-1.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kousalya vs The Joint Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2017