Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Kosampudi Baby Sarojini vs The Sub Registrar

High Court Of Telangana|05 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.32260 of 2014 Between:
Kosampudi Baby Sarojini, W/o. Appalaraju, Hindu, Female, Aged: 42 years, R/o. Gollelapalem Village, Subbavaram Mandalam, Visakhapatnam District & another .. Petitioners AND The Sub-Registrar, Sabbavaram Mandal and Village, Visakhapatnam District & another .. Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.32260 of 2014 ORDER:
The case of the petitioners is that when they presented the Deed of Conveyance in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 7.86 cents in Survey Nos.35/14, 35/15, 2/4 of Sabbavaram Mandalam, Gollepalam Village, Visakhapatnam District, before the Sub-Registrar, Sabbavaram Mandal & Village, Visakhapatnam District (1st respondent) for registration, he refused to receive the same. Hence this writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that irrespective of the status of the land, the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse to receive the document at the threshold. However, no evidence is shown as proof of presentation of document for registration.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to present the Deed of Conveyance before the Sub-Registrar, Sabbavaram Mandal & Village, Viskhapatnam District (1st respondent). As and when such Deed of Conveyance is presented, the Sub- Registrar shall receive and process the same in accordance with Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. If the Sub-Registrar has valid reasons for refusing to register the Deed of Conveyance, he shall pass orders under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of such document. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 5th November, 2014 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.32260 of 2014 Date: 5th November, 2014 KL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kosampudi Baby Sarojini vs The Sub Registrar

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
05 November, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao