Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Kodakaran vs Kuppuraj

Madras High Court|23 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
ub It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
23.01.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To The District Munsif, Dharmapuri.
CRP(PD).No.3308 of 2012 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kodakaran vs Kuppuraj

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 January, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.