Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the applicant has already been granted bail by this Court in the connected case crime No.1622 of 2009, under sections 467,468,419,420,384 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 32653/09 on 11.12.2009. He further submits that the applicant is a journalist and only in order to harass and victimise her the present prosecution has been launched. He further submits that the applicant is a ladyand is entitled to the benefit contained under section 437 Cr.P.C. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 11.10.2009.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Let the applicant Km. Suparna Dwivedi involved in Case Crime No. 1622-B of 2009 under Sections 467,468,471,419,420,384 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act ., P.S. Rath, District Hamirpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
(iv)The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month to show his good conduct and behavior.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 18.1.2010 MLK