Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Km Sandhya Tripathi vs D I O S And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33530 of 2002 Petitioner :- Km. Sandhya Tripathi Respondent :- D.I.O.S. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parmatma Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(i) That a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus be issued to the respondents to permit the petitioner from and work as an Assistant clerk in the office of Respondent no. 2 (ii) A further mandamus be issued directing the respondent no. 1 to pay the past salary to the petitioner from 2.9.2000, for which he is entitled to deduct from the grant in aid.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Km Sandhya Tripathi vs D I O S And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Parmatma Rai