1.There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2.The substantive prayer made in the writ petition is as follows: .. .. to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2014 and thereby direct the 3rd respondent to return the petitioner's license in D.L.No.TN21 19990000955 which was seized by the 4th respondent and handed over to the 3rd respondent.
3.Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, who appears for the respondents 1 to 4, says that, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner, has been returned his license, after the period of suspension got over.
4. I am informed that the petitioner's license was suspended for a period of six months and that, it has been returned to the petitioner, thereafter.
5.Based on the submission made by Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, the writ petition is disposed of. 5.1 The Registry will, however, dispatch a copy of the order to the petitioner at the address given in the writ petition. 5.2 There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
15.02.2017 Index:Yes/No kj To
1.The Transport Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2.The Assistant Licensing Authority Regional Transport Office Kancheepuram.
3.The Regional Transport Officer Regional Transport Office Kovur, Kundrathur Chennai.
4.The Inspector of Police Traffic Investigation Wing Poonamallee, Chennai-56.
5.The General Manager Metropolitan Transport Corporation Chennai Limited, Chennai-2.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
kj W.P.No.10564 of 2014 15.02.2017