Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Kittur Channamma Mahila Swa Sahaya And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Karnataka State Transport Authority And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos. 37593-37596/2014(GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
1. KITTUR CHANNAMMA MAHILA SWA SAHAYA GUMPU K.BEVINAHALLI, HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE-577 516 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SMT.A.S.NIRMALA W/O A. SIDAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
2. SRI DHANALAXMI MAHILA SWA SAHAYA SANGHA KONDAJJI POST, HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REPRESENTATIVE NO.1 SMT.SHAKUNTHALA DEVI W/O KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M. S.ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577001.
3. THE ZILLA PANCHAYATH DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
4. HARIHAR TALUK MAHILA SUPPLEMENTARY NUTRITION PRODUCTION CENTER UJJENI SIDDESHWARA RISE MILL COMPOUND MAHAJENAHALLI, SHIMOGA ROAD HARIHAR-577601.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
5. DAVANAGERE TALUK MAHILA SUPPLEMENTARY NUTRITION PRODUCTION CENTER AVERAGOL, DAVANAGERE-577 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA. FOR R1 & R2, SRI. N.R.JAGADEESWARA, ADV. FOR R3, R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE TENDER NOTIFICATION DT.20.5.14, & CORRIGENDUM DT.18.7.14 IN TENDER ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY MSPTC, HARIHAR TQ. VIDE ANNEXURE-B & B1 & THE TENDER NOTIFICATIONS DT.20.5.14, & CORRIGENDUM DT.NIL IN TENDER ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY MSPTC, DAVANAGERE TQ. VIDE ANNEXURE-C & C1.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that these petitions do not survive for consideration. Hence, the petitions may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo filed, these petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE DM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kittur Channamma Mahila Swa Sahaya And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Karnataka State Transport Authority And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad