Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kirti Pal Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13599 of 2004 Applicant :- Kirti Pal Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shamim Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
List revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application. However, learned A.G.A. is present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case cause of action still survives, it would be open to the applicant to move a recall application or avail any other remedy available to him under law and procedure.
Order Date :- 28.7.2018 Anand Sri./-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kirti Pal Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 July, 2018
Judges
  • Ravindra Nath Kakkar
Advocates
  • Shamim Ahmed

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.