Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kish Muhammad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17538 of 2021 Petitioner :- Kish Muhammad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Anoop Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
Notice need not to be sent to the private respondents, at this stage.
This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the restoration application, which is pending since the year 2020 in proceedings under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending and, as such, respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the restoration application No. RST/02394 of 2019 (Computer Case No. T201954402394), in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, preferably within a period of next four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the High Court.
Writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 23.9.2021 Shekhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kish Muhammad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anoop Kumar Singh