Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Khoday India Ltd vs The Income Tax Officer And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|10 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.42943/2018 (T – IT) BETWEEN:
KHODAY INDIA LTD ., ’BREWERY HOUSE’, 7TH MILE KANAKPURA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 062 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI K.L.SWAMY ... PETITIONER [BY SRI A.SHANKAR, SENIOR ADV. FOR SRI S.SUKUMAR, ADV.] AND:
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(1)(2) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095.
2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU - 4 BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) – 4, 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE COMMUNICATION DATED 12.06.2018 VIDE ANNX-W TO PAY 10% OF THE DISPUTED DEMAND WITHIN 31.12.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16, PENDING DISPOSAL OF APPEAL BY R-3 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel Sri.Jeevan J. Neeralgi is permitted to accept notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal, at this stage.
3. The petitioner-company has assailed the order of demand arising out of the order of Assessment under Section 143 [3] read with the order passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ['Act' for short] dated 29.12.2017 passed by the respondent No.2, relating to the assessment year 2015-2016, whereby the petitioner is directed to pay 10% of the disputed demand before 31.12.2018 in three installments pending disposal of the appeal by the respondent No.3 interalia seeking a direction to the respondent No.3 to dispose of the appeals in an expedite manner.
4. Learned Senior Counsel Sri A.Shankar representing the petitioner’s counsel has submitted that though the Regular Appeal against the impugned Assessment Order is pending before the First Appellate Authority, since the Company is in financial doldrums, it is not in a position to pay the amount as directed by the respondent No.2 and hence some interim protection may be given to the Company while the Appellate Authority may be requested to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the law, as the issue is covered by the Special Bench decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
5. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that Rs.14 lakhs has already been deposited by the petitioner against the demand made by the Revenue.
6. Reference was made to the very same Assessee’s case, in W.P.No.42848/2018 dated 24.09.2018, wherein this Court was pleased to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the petitioner-company to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- out of the disputed demand reserving liberty to the petitioner to move before the concerned First Appellate Authority for early hearing of the appeal subject to the deposit, as directed. It is observed that the learned CIT [Appeals] may consider the request of the Assessee-company to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.
7. Learned counsel Sri.Jeevan J. Neeralgi appearing for the Revenue has no objection to dispose of the writ petition in terms of the order of this Court in W.P.No.42848/2018, as aforementioned.
8. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and in view of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in the very same Assessee’s case as aforesaid, this Court is of the considered opinion that justice would be sub-served in directing the petitioner- company to deposit Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs only) in addition to the amount already deposited if any, on or before 21.01.2019 with liberty to move before the concerned First Appellate Authority for early disposal of the appeal, subject to the aforesaid deposit.
Learned CIT [Appeals] may consider the request of the Assessee-company to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.
Ordered accordingly. No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Khoday India Ltd vs The Income Tax Officer And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 January, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha