Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35721 of 2018 Petitioner :- Keshav Respondent :- State Of U P And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondents.
The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 18.7.2018 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Patiyala, Distt. Kasganj under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the order impugned the petitioner has got alternative efficacious remedy to file appeal under Section 24 (4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Commissioner of the Division and as such the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
The Court has proceeded to examine the record in question and find substance in the objection raised by learned Standing Counsel. However, in the interest of justice, it is provided that in case the petitioner preferred appeal as has been provided within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on merits of the case expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.10.2018 SP/