Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Keraliya Vanitha Samajam vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala|24 October, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers :
I. Call for the records leading to Ext. P9 and to quash Ext. P9 by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order.
II. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to return Ext. P2 title deed No. 1854/1977 of Kochi Sub Registry to the petitioner forthwith or within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
III Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
IV Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to abstain from interfering with the activities of the petitioner samajam in the property covered by Ext. P2.
W.P.(C) No. 27759 of 2014 : 2 :
V. Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case; and VI Award costs of these proceedings.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been brought to the notice of the second respondent by way of Ext. P8 and that the prayer is only to cause the same to be considered and finalized within a reasonable time. It is also stated that no further proceedings are liable to be pursued based on Ext. P9.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 as well, who submits that, Ext. P8 can be considered and appropriate orders will be passed within a reasonable time.
4. In the said circumstances, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P8, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also the 3rd respondent, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
W.P.(C) No. 27759 of 2014 : 3 :
The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps.
kmd sd/-
P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Keraliya Vanitha Samajam vs State Of Kerala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
24 October, 2014
Judges
  • P R Ramachandra Menon
Advocates
  • Smt
  • I S Laila