IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.8035 OF 2017(KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT.KEMPAMMA W/O CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT KODATHI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, CARMELLARAM POST, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 35. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI BYRE REDDY M.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU – 560 036. ... RESPONDENT (BY SMT.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, HCGP) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 27.12.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-L ISSUED BY RESPONDENT-TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU EAST TALUK ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. He is permitted to file his memo of appearance within a period of four weeks.
2. The plea of the petitioner is that his representation for grant of certain documents from the respondent – Tahsildar, was rejected in terms of the impugned order dated 27.12.2016, vide Annexure-L.
3. The learned Government Advocate submits that if reasonable time is granted, the required certified copies will be granted to the petitioner. He further submits that yet another representation may be filed by the petitioner to the same.
4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed off, with a liberty to the petitioner to make another representation for the grant of the certified copies of the documents he so desires. On furnishing of such a representation, the respondent to make available the certified copies of the documents in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a said representation.
SD/- JUDGE JJ