Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Kempamma And Others vs Pape Gowda And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|10 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1372 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KEMPAMMA WIFE OF SHIVANNE GOWDA, DAUGHTER OF KEMPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT MARBALLI HUNDI VILLAGE, JAUAPURA HOBLI,MYSORE TALUK, PIN CODE - 570 008.
2. CHIKKATHYAMMA DAUGHTER OF KEMPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
3. SMT. CHOWDAMMA WIFE OF LATE SIDDEGOWDA, DAUGHTER OF KEMPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.
4. SMT. KEMPAMMA WIFE OF PUTTE GOWDA, DAUGHTER OF KEMPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
THE APPELLANT NO. 2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT MHADESHWARA ROAD, NANJANGUD TOWN, MYSORE PIN CODE - 571 301.
(BY SRI ROHITH D. K., ADVOCATE ( ABSENT)) ... APPELLANTS AND:
1. PAPE GOWDA SON OF LATE PAPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, RESIDING AT KELLAHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, PIN CODE - 570 008.
2. SMT. MARININGAMMA WIFE OF LATE PAPE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT KELLAHALLI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, PIN CODE - 570 008.
3. KEMPE GOWDA, SON OF KEMPE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT DODDAKANYA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, PIN CODE - 570 008.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.3.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.515/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.3.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.384/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDE AND CJM, MYSURU..
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment On 01.08.2019, three weeks’ time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellants to comply with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal shall be listed for dismissal if the office objections are not complied with. Despite this order, the office objections have not been attended to. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. As such, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Kempamma And Others vs Pape Gowda And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 October, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad