(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner, an encroacher, has been evicted. The petitioner filed a suit in which ultimately the interim application was dismissed. The encroachment has been removed after show cause notice. The request of the petitioner for patta has been declined.
2.In view of the aforesaid facts, we see no reason to entertain the petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking restoration of possession.
Writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos. 2748 and 2749 of 2017 also stand dismissed.
(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 06.02.2017 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To
1.Tamil Nadu State Bhoodan Yagna Board, Rep. By its Chairman, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
2.The Director of Land Reforms and Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Board, O/o.Director of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chennai 600 005.
3.The Special Officer cum Director of Rural Development, Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Board, Panagal Maligai Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.
4.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem 636 001.
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and M.Sundar, J.
(sra)
5.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, Salem 636 001.
6.The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar, Salem Taluk, Salem District.
7.The Revenue Inspector, Valasaiyur Firga, Salem Taluk, Salem District.
W.P.No.2815 of 2017 06.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in