Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Keerthi Rendezvous Apartment Owner’S vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|14 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.18699 OF 2013 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN:
KEERTHI RENDEZVOUS APARTMENT OWNER’S WELFARE ASSOCIATION KEERTHI RENDEZVOUS 16TH -E CROSS 1ST MAIN, PAI LAYOUT BANGALORE-16 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJU P, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-01 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
… PETITIONER 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE BRUHATH MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE BANGALORE-02.
3. THE BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD (BWSSB) CAUVERI BHAVAN 2ND FLOOR, BANALORE-09 REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
4. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER (CMC) BWSSB, CAUVERI BHAVAN 2ND FLOOR, BANGALORE-09.
5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CMC-II-II, SUB DIVISION, BWSSB A R CIRCLE, BANGALORE-09.
6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EAST-3 SUB DIVISION BWSSB B-31, ITI COLONY SOUTH AVENUE RAMAMURTHY NAGAR BANGALORE-560016.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. B.V. MURALIDHAR, ADV., FOR R2 SRI. M. KARUNAKAR, ADV., FOR R3 – R6 (ABSENT) SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADV., FOR R2 (ABSENT)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO REFRAIN THE RESPONDENTS OR EMPLOYERS OF THE RESPONDENTS FROM AFFIXING OR LAYING UGD PIPES INSIDE THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE OR CONNECTING UGD PIPE CONNECTION FROM VIVEKANANDA ROAD TO THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE EXISTING INSIDE THE PREMISES OF KEERTHI RENDEZVOUS APARTMENT AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Smt.Niloufer Akbar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1.
Sri.Basavaraju P, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo for retirement. The same is accepted.
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Keerthi Rendezvous Apartment Owner’S vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe