Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

K.C.Ramalingam vs Executive Officer

Madras High Court|18 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The petitioner is the owner of Raja Kalai Arangam Cinema Theatre situated within the limits of Kurinjipadi Town Panchayat. The said Town Panchayat, by the impugned notice dated 07.03.2003 and also by the consequential notice dated 30.05.2003, has demanded arrears of property tax to the tune of Rs.32808.60, challenging which, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. At the time of admission of the writ petition, on 10.06.2003, this Court, has granted conditional stay of the impugned orders, which reads as follows:-
There shall be an order of interim stay subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the demand in two equal instalments. The first of such instalment shall be paid within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and the next instalment within four weeks thereafter. The petitioner shall continue to pay the property tax at the rate of 50% of the present demand, until further orders for the future years.
In default of payment of the conditions imposed, the stay will get automatically vacated.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had filed O.S.No.40 of 2000 before the District Munsif, Cuddalore, challenging the levy of property tax and has obtained an exparte decree on 06.11.2001 and therefore, the demand made by the respondent is illegal.
4. In my considered opinion of this Court, a Civil Suit against the Municipality challenging the levy is not maintainable, as an appeal/revision remedy is provided under the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act itself, as against an order of assessment.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed, with liberty to the writ petitioner to file an appeal/revision before the appropriate authority, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, challenging the impugned notice dated 07.03.2003 and the consequential order dated 30.05.2003. It is made clear that in the event of the writ petitioner succeeding in the appeal/revision, the Municipality shall refund the amount, if any, paid by the petitioner, pursuant to the interim order dated 10.06.2003 granted by this Court, of course, subject to the right of the Municipality to agitate the matter before the higher forum.
There will be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
18.01.2017 rg To Executive Officer, Kurinjipadi Town Panchayat Kurinjipadi, Cuddalore District P.N.PRAKASH,J rg Writ Petition No.16363 of 2003 18.01.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

K.C.Ramalingam vs Executive Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 January, 2017