Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Kayyum vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50398 of 2021 Applicant :- Kayyum Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Shahnawaz Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Syed Shahnawaz Shah, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vikas Sahai, learned A.G.A. for the State.
A first information report was lodged as Case Crime No.0397 of 2021 at Police Station- Babugarh, District-Hapur under Sections 3/5/8 of the Cow Slaughter Act.
The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Sessions Judge, Hapur on 08.11.2021. The applicant is in jail since 19.10.2021, pursuant to the said F.I.R.
Shri Syed Shahnawaz Shah, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. No recovery of cow meat has been made from the applicant. The applicant was named by a co-accused in a statement given to the police authorities. The aforesaid statement is not reliable. Learned counsel for the applicant has explained the criminal history of the applicant and further contends that the same has no bearing on the instant case. Lastly it is contended by the learned counsel for applicant that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully cooperate in the criminal law proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner.
Learned A.G.A could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. However, he does not contest the criminal history of the applicant as disclosed in the bail application.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Kayyum involved in Case Case Crime No.397 of 2021 at Police Station- Babugarh, District-Hapur under Sections 3/5/8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not influence any witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 Nadeem
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kayyum vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2021
Judges
  • Ajay Bhanot
Advocates
  • Syed Shahnawaz Shah