Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S.Kavi Logistics vs The Check Post Officer

Madras High Court|20 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 08.01.2017 detaining the goods and also directing the consignor to show cause for compounding of offence punishable under Section 71 ( 5) (a) of the TNVAT Act 2006.
2.The petitioner is the transporter of the goods detained. The impugned notice was issued on the driver of the petitioner namely, one Nagaraj. When this matter was taken up earlier by this Court on 25.01.2017, the petitioner came forward to make one time tax payment to expedite the release of the goods and accordingly, an order was passed on the same day, directing the respondent to release the subject matter of the goods to the petitioner immediately on payment of one time tax, however, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. This Court has also directed the owner of the subject goods to be made as a party/respondent in this writ petition and accordingly, the said owner is impleaded as a second respondent in this Writ Petition.
3.Notice issued to the second respondent by this Court was also served. However, when this matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the second respondent either in person or through counsel. The name of the second respondent is printed in the cause list.
4. It is represented by both the sides that in pursuant to the payment of one time tax, the goods were released.
5.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the said payment of one time tax was made without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, they may be given liberty to challenge such imposition of tax and compounding fee before the revisional authority. It is needless to say that if the said payment of one time tax was made by the petitioner without prejudice to their rights and contentions, it is always open to them to challenge the imposition of tax and compounding fee before the revisional authority either by themselves or the second respondent herein, who is the owner of the goods. Granting such liberty and also considering the fact that the goods have already been released, this writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.03.2017 dn To
1.The Check Post Officer, Commercial Taxes Check Post, Palakkad Main Road, Gopalapuram, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.
2.M/s. Pulkit Metal Private Limited, RS.No.95/2, 3 & 4, Eripakkam Village, Netapakkam Commune, Puducherry.
K.RAVI CHANDRA BAABU J., dn WP.No. 1785 of 2017 20.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S.Kavi Logistics vs The Check Post Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 March, 2017