IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR REVIEW PETITION NO.409 OF 2018 IN WRIT APPEAL NOS.967 AND 968 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
KAVITA PODWAL DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI K V M PODUVAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.11, MAKARA JYOTI, NARAYANA REDDY LAYOUT, BEHIND ATLANTA SCHOOL, DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU-560 037.
... PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA PODWAL, PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND:
1. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002.
2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER HOODI SUB-DIVISION, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU-560 048.
3. SAGHIR AHMED SON OF SRI BASHEER AHMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.3/1A, MOSQUE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560 005, BY GPA HOLDER, SHOEB AHMED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SON OF BASHER AHMED KHAN.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 01.08.2017 PASSED ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2016 IN WRIT APPEAL NOS.967 AND 968 OF 2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, BY THIS COURT.
***** THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Heard the arguments of petitioner - party-in-person at length.
2. We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record that calls for any interference. The dispute is sought to be re-agitated. Considered grounds cannot be re-agitated in a Review Petition. We do not think it appropriate to re-hear the entire dispute. We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, Review Petition is dismissed. Consequently, I.A.No.1 of 2018 is also dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rsk/-