Hon'ble Yogendra Kumar Sangal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 574 of 2009, under Sections 364, 504, 323, 406 & 392 IPC, police station Haiderganj, district Faizabad.
We have gone through the contents of the FIR. Although, learned counsel for the petitioners tried to claim parity with the order passed in Writ Petition No. 12094 of 2009 Pushpa Singh vs. State of U.P. & others dated 24.12.2009 but case of the petitioners is quite distinguishable from the case of Pushpa Singh since the allegations made in the FIR are specific against the petitioners. Since the FIR discloses commission of cognizable aoffence, as such, the same cannot be quashed.
However, it is provided that if petitioners surrender and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously by the courts below.
With the aforesaid directions/observations writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.1.2010 Kaushal