Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Kaulpati Devi vs Nayab Tehsildar Tehsil Dhanghata And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38360 of 2018 Petitioner :- Kaulpati Devi Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar Tehsil Dhanghata And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narain Pandey,Shravan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Aggrieved by the fact that the mutation case is pending since 2013, the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under Rule 34(7) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar had to decide the mutation case in a maximum period of 90 days.
It is, therefore, directed that the Case No.865/T- 201617650103186 of 2013 (Smt. Kulpati Devi Vs. Kali Prasad) be decided within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.11.2018 GS (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kaulpati Devi vs Nayab Tehsildar Tehsil Dhanghata And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2018
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Shyam Narain Pandey Shravan Kumar Pandey